ShopDreamUp AI ArtDreamUp
Deviation Actions
The riddle of who was woman behind the enigmatic symbol of femininity that is the Mona Lisa has been solved. Theorists had long held forth suppositions that ranged from the woman being DaVinci’s mother to a prostitute and finally to the artist himself in feminine form. After four centuries of fierce debate, researchers today revealed that the woman in question was a mother of five, Lisa Gherardini the wife of wealthy Florentine silk merchant Ser Francesco del Giocondo.
A French expert reported that a careful study of the painting by a team of scientists using infrared and 3-D technology revealed that the woman in the painting had just given birth to her second son at the time of the sitting. The technology enabled the scientists to see details long obscured through the many layers of paint. The dress was covered in a fine, transparent gauze veil, typically worn by Italian women in the 16th Century who were either pregnant or had just given birth. With these newly-discovered details, the painting has now been dated to 1503.
Several assumptions were turned on their head, not the least of which that the subject of the painting had been a prostitute. Bruno Mottin of the French Museums' Centre for Research and Restoration said in interviews that subject had not let her hair hang freely but in fact wore a bonnet from which only a few curls managed to escape. Allowing one’s hair to hang freely during the Renaissance was typical of young girls and women of poor virtue, hence the confusion about the identity of the woman who sat for the portrait.
Teacher Giuseppe Pallantini spent 25 years researching the connections between DaVinci family and the merchant. He discovered during his research that the Italian biographer of Renaissance artists, Giorgio Vasari, was a credible source for correctly identifying the subject of the portrait as early as 1550; Vasari had known the Giocondo family personally.
Pallantini said in the London Telegraph that Lisa Gherardini was aged about 24 when she sat for the portrait. Amongst the many documents relating to DaVinci and his most famous and enduring subject, the teacher found Ser Francesco's will in which he praised his beloved wife. He also found the birth certificates of their five children, two of whom took religious vows, were also uncovered. No record of the death of Lisa Gherardini was found, but her death is estimated to have occurred between 1540 and 1570.
Mr. Pallantini presented his research in a book which has only recently been published. While scholars are generally appreciative of his meticulous research and the conclusions drawn, some are careful to suggest that Pallantini’s findings are not absolute proof that Lisa Gherardini is the Mona Lisa – but they do come close enough to merit serious consideration.
A French expert reported that a careful study of the painting by a team of scientists using infrared and 3-D technology revealed that the woman in the painting had just given birth to her second son at the time of the sitting. The technology enabled the scientists to see details long obscured through the many layers of paint. The dress was covered in a fine, transparent gauze veil, typically worn by Italian women in the 16th Century who were either pregnant or had just given birth. With these newly-discovered details, the painting has now been dated to 1503.
Several assumptions were turned on their head, not the least of which that the subject of the painting had been a prostitute. Bruno Mottin of the French Museums' Centre for Research and Restoration said in interviews that subject had not let her hair hang freely but in fact wore a bonnet from which only a few curls managed to escape. Allowing one’s hair to hang freely during the Renaissance was typical of young girls and women of poor virtue, hence the confusion about the identity of the woman who sat for the portrait.
Teacher Giuseppe Pallantini spent 25 years researching the connections between DaVinci family and the merchant. He discovered during his research that the Italian biographer of Renaissance artists, Giorgio Vasari, was a credible source for correctly identifying the subject of the portrait as early as 1550; Vasari had known the Giocondo family personally.
Pallantini said in the London Telegraph that Lisa Gherardini was aged about 24 when she sat for the portrait. Amongst the many documents relating to DaVinci and his most famous and enduring subject, the teacher found Ser Francesco's will in which he praised his beloved wife. He also found the birth certificates of their five children, two of whom took religious vows, were also uncovered. No record of the death of Lisa Gherardini was found, but her death is estimated to have occurred between 1540 and 1570.
Mr. Pallantini presented his research in a book which has only recently been published. While scholars are generally appreciative of his meticulous research and the conclusions drawn, some are careful to suggest that Pallantini’s findings are not absolute proof that Lisa Gherardini is the Mona Lisa – but they do come close enough to merit serious consideration.
Been SO long I know
Well it's been yonks since I've done anything here. And the main reason for that is...
Burnout and an intense fear of failure on top of the sharp edges of Life on many fronts.
I've made the conscious decision to not only work on my digital art skills, but put my money where my desire is. So I signed up for this: http://www.conceptart.org/go/learn/ ...
I will finally get to use my old Wacom Intuos 3 tablet collecting dust. In the meantime I need to clean up this space. It's not a shining example of where I am now.
Bread and butter these days is Freelance Journalism, mainly with Indian Country Media Network: https://indiancountrymedianetwor
9-11: My Story (Repost from 9-11, 2006)
Somethiing I really don't talk about much in depth with people....
"Don't think, feel. It is like a finger pointing a way to the Moon. Don't concentrate on the finger or you will miss all that heavenly glory." (Bruce Lee, Enter the Dragon)
Ive taken the day off work today.
I refuse to put on the act and play the game not today of all days.
I'm watching the documentary of documentaries about 9/11 by the Naudet Brothers. I know that firehouse a little bit I used to go to the Kinkos Copies across the street from it on occasion. Its really strange to think about the streets I used to wal
dAlicious Tidbits #2 Feature and SITAS
My recent dA News Resources article "Plagiarism on the Web" is being featured in dAlicious Tidbits #2 by the lovely ~drop-asd (https://www.deviantart.com/drop-asd) :w00t:
"dAlicious titbits is a detailed compilation of different kinds of events, contests, projects, features, interviews and whatnots going on around the site.
The aim of this article is to help you find your way to some delicious information around the site as well as help you find assistance for your projects. Please, fav it or leave me a comment to support it."
Please do have a look dAlicious here http://news.deviantart.com/article/126812/
EDIT:
The resources I listed in the article are also being added
Featured in Creative Commons Book re dA
EDIT: Updated Links as of 23 August 2010
I am pleased to announce that after all these years I just discovered that the Creative Commons Wiki features a dA article I wrote on the subject of the CC License.
The CC dA Case Study feature can be read here: http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Case_Studies/DeviantART and here in this study of the visual arts (PDF):http://creativecommons.org.au/content/BAAC_visual_arts_cluster.pdf
My original article about the introduction of the license here on dA can be read here: http://news.deviantart.com/article/23957/
My article is also part of a larger book, "Building an Australasian Commons" edited by Rachel
© 2006 - 2024 IconicImagery
Comments88
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
come and see my mona lisa.....